English
Maharashtra’s political dispute will be heard in the Supreme Court today, constitution bench will be considered
[ad_1]
Eknath Shinde Vs Uddhav Thackeray: of Shiv Sena Eknath Shinde And after the separation of the Uddhav Thackeray faction and the formation of a new government in Maharashtra under the leadership of Shinde, the controversy over who is Shiv Sena has deepened so much that the matter has been taken up by the Supreme Court. has reached. The Supreme Court will hear all the matters related to this political dispute today. This hearing was earlier scheduled to be held on Monday, August 1, which was postponed and the date of its hearing was fixed on Wednesday, August 3. Let us tell you that the bench of Chief Justice NV Ramana, Justice Krishna Murari and Hima Kohli will hear this matter.
Hearing was held on July 20
Earlier in the hearing held on July 20, the court had indicated that a constitution bench could be constituted to hear the matter. On that day, the court had asked all the parties to talk among themselves and submit a compilation of the points of hearing. Let us inform that many petitions of leaders of both the factions are pending in the Supreme Court and in these petitions many issues like disqualification of MLAs, invitation to Shinde faction on behalf of Governor, issue of two whips of Shiv Sena in trust vote have been raised.
Both the Shinde-Uddhav factions have put forth their demands.
The Uddhav Thackeray faction has also filed a new petition demanding that the Supreme Court stay the process going on in the Election Commission to allot Shiv Sena’s election symbol. In another petition of Uddhav Camp, the action of the Lok Sabha Speaker has also been challenged. So at the same time, in this petition, there has been opposition to the recognition of Shinde party MP Rahul Shewale as the leader of the party in the Lok Sabha and Bhavna Gawale as the Chief Whip.
In the last hearing, the court had given instructions
In the last hearing, the Supreme Court had directed to maintain status quo on issues like disqualification of MLAs. At the same time, it was also said that all the records of the assembly related to the matter should be kept safe. Today the court can decide whether to refer it to a 5-judge Constitution Bench due to the constitutional questions being raised in the matter. In such a situation, the court can also decide the framework of further hearing. If any interim relief is sought from either side, then a 3-judge bench can also consider it.
read this also:
Source link
You must be logged in to post a comment Login